Skip to content

Synthetic monitoring alternative

Monitor production without writing a single test script

Synthetic monitoring tools like Checkly and Datadog Synthetic require you to write and maintain test scripts for every scenario you want to monitor. Sitewatch takes a different approach: it automatically discovers and validates every asset on every page — JS bundles, stylesheets, third-party scripts, redirect chains — with zero scripting. Add a URL, get monitoring in 60 seconds.

  • Zero test scripts: Sitewatch discovers and checks assets automatically
  • 20 detection rules — every file checked, every redirect followed, every certificate watched
  • Deploy hooks: verify production the moment your deploy completes — no test script needed

Free scan

Scan your site right now — zero setup

See what Sitewatch catches that test scripts miss.

02Side by side

Synthetic monitoring vs Sitewatch asset monitoring

Requires writing test scripts

Synthetic monitoring (Checkly / Playwright):
Yes — written in JavaScript or TypeScript
Sitewatch asset monitoring:
No — zero scripts, zero config

Automatic asset discovery

Synthetic monitoring (Checkly / Playwright):
No — only checks what you script
Sitewatch asset monitoring:
Yes — every JS, CSS, image, font, third-party script

Catches files served as the wrong kind of file

Synthetic monitoring (Checkly / Playwright):
Only if explicitly asserted in scripts
Sitewatch asset monitoring:
Automatic on every check

Setup time

Synthetic monitoring (Checkly / Playwright):
60 minutes (write, test, deploy scripts)
Sitewatch asset monitoring:
60 seconds (paste URL, done)

Maintenance burden

Synthetic monitoring (Checkly / Playwright):
Scripts rot as UI changes — constant upkeep
Sitewatch asset monitoring:
Zero maintenance — adapts automatically

Catches third-party script outages

Synthetic monitoring (Checkly / Playwright):
Only if you script the check
Sitewatch asset monitoring:
Every third-party asset checked automatically

Deploy hook integration

Synthetic monitoring (Checkly / Playwright):
Yes (CLI + CI)
Sitewatch asset monitoring:
Yes (Vercel, Netlify, GitHub Actions)

Plain-English diagnosis

Synthetic monitoring (Checkly / Playwright):
Raw assertion failure output
Sitewatch asset monitoring:
What broke, which asset, why it matters

03No scripts required

Everything Sitewatch monitors automatically

Zero test scripts

Sitewatch fetches your pages, parses the HTML, and validates every linked asset automatically. No Playwright scripts, no test maintenance — just paste your URL and monitoring starts.

Wrong kind of file

Catches JS served as HTML, CSS served as plain text, and any asset delivered with the wrong content type. The server answers normally throughout, so a scripted check misses all of it unless someone wrote an assertion for that exact file.

Change detection

Every file is fingerprinted. When one changes between deploys — intentionally or not — Sitewatch detects it immediately without any scripted assertions.

Third-party script monitoring

Stripe, Intercom, analytics, chat widgets — every third-party dependency on your page is checked on every monitoring interval. If Stripe.js 404s, you know before your users do.

Deploy hooks

Trigger verification automatically the moment your deploy completes via Vercel, Netlify, or GitHub Actions webhooks. No test script needed — Sitewatch re-validates every asset on the deployed page.

Plain-English diagnosis

When something breaks, you get the exact asset, the failure type, and what it means — not raw script output or assertion failures to decode. What broke, which asset, why it matters.

04The cost of the gap

The failure no script was written for.

Friday, 4:47pm

The deploy succeeds.

Every scripted journey passes.

The team logs off for the weekend.

Synthetic tests: 12/12 green

Monday, 9:12am

A client calls.

Nobody has been able to check out.

All weekend.

Two days of lost sales

The broken file was added to the page after the tests were written, so nothing looked at it. A check that reads the page instead of following a script would have caught it on the deploy.

05Simple by design

From URL to full monitoring in 60 seconds

  1. 01

    Add your URL — no scripts, no config

    Paste the URL you want to monitor. No test scripts to write, no browser automation to configure, no CI pipeline to wire up. One URL is all Sitewatch needs.

  2. 02

    Sitewatch crawls your page and discovers every asset

    Sitewatch fetches your page, parses the HTML, and builds a complete inventory of every linked script, stylesheet, image, font, and third-party dependency.

  3. 03

    Each asset is checked on every monitoring interval

    Is it there, is it the kind of file it claims to be, and has it changed — all checked on every run. New assets added to the page are discovered and checked automatically.

  4. 04

    Alerts with diagnosis if anything changes or breaks

    When an asset fails, you get an alert with the exact file path, failure type, and a plain-English explanation of what it means — no script output to parse.

06An honest answer

Which should you actually choose?

Scripted synthetic monitoring reaches places we deliberately do not. This is a genuine trade, not a straight upgrade.

Verifying a multi-step journey completes end to end Scripted synthetics
Asserting on what a form or payment actually returns Scripted synthetics
Monitoring defined as code and reviewed in pull requests Scripted synthetics
Coverage without writing or maintaining any scripts SitewatchResources nobody remembered to write a test for SitewatchDozens of client sites without a test suite each SitewatchA non-developer to be able to read the alert SitewatchMarketing sites watched without engineering time SitewatchChecks that run on every deploy Either

Sitewatch probably isn't for you if…

  • You need a scripted multi-step journey verified — we do not do that, and a resource check is not a substitute.
  • You have engineers who are happy to maintain those scripts and want that level of control.
  • You want your monitoring in version control.
  • The journeys you need proven are multi-step and stateful, which is exactly what scripts are for.

Live monitoring

Sitewatch is watching these sites right now

Real sites we check every few minutes for the failures uptime tools miss — the pages that stay “up” while something quietly breaks.

  • netlify.com
  • coachplan.dk
  • arnoldandassociate.com
  • solklar.dk
  • kostpartneren.dk
  • wordpress-guiden.dk
  • whatcanidowiththismajor.com
  • jumpshare.com
  • unlimitedperformance.dk
  • maravillabali.com
  • dynalead.net
  • jakobshof-lehr.de
  • trestlescan.com
  • directlifly.com

zero

test scripts required

60 sec

setup time

20

detection rules

Stop writing monitoring scripts.

Sitewatch monitors your production site automatically — from $0.

Start monitoring in 60 seconds

No test scripts. No configuration. Free plan available.

07Common misconceptions

What people get wrong about the alternative.

No

Myth — Script-free means shallower.

Reality — It means differently shaped. A script checks what you told it to; reading the page checks everything the page actually asks for, including what was added last week.

No

Myth — Scripted tests already cover the assets.

Reality — They cover the assets involved in the steps you wrote. The classic failure is a resource added after the test — it breaks and the test still passes.

No

Myth — You have to pick one approach.

Reality — The strongest setup is often both: scripts prove the journey completes, page checks catch the missing file that empties the page.

Yes

Myth — Scripted synthetics are better at flows.

Reality — Yes. If a multi-step journey is what you need verified, buy that and skip us.

08FAQ

Frequently asked questions